10. Comparing revisions

Every simulation you submit creates a new revision. Compare puts all revisions of a configuration side by side, so you can see what each change did and pick the best design.

Opening the comparison

In the revision bar, click Compare. The Compare Simulations dialog opens:

Compare Simulations dialog

The table has one column per revision (Rev 1, Rev 2, …) and is organised in three blocks. The full table from the example is shown below.

Full comparison table

1. Parameters that differ

The top rows list the input parameters that differ between revisions, along with the key analytical results that depend on them. In the example, only the air gap was changed (0.30 → 0.50 → 0.60 → 0.70 → 0.35 mm), so the table also shows the resulting air gap peak flux density (0.918 → 0.858 T).

2. Result

For each revision: the simulation status (complete / error), the nominal torque, and the simulated back-EMF RMS per phase. In the example, the back-EMF falls from 5.29 V to 4.66 V as the air gap grows from 0.30 to 0.70 mm, and the torque drops from 0.10 to 0.09 Nm.

3. BackEMF harmonics (best highlighted)

The nominal torque and the harmonic figures from the Harmonics tab (guide 8) for every revision. The best revision is shown in bold in the nominal torque (highest), torque ripple, position error and THD (lowest) rows:

RowWhat it tells you
h5, h7The raw 5th and 7th harmonics that the two rows below are built from
6ω torque rippleSmooth torque
6ω position errorSensorless control accuracy
THD, what the drive seesOverall line-to-line waveform quality

At the bottom, L2L BackEMF per Speed plots every revision's back-EMF against speed on one chart. A steeper line means a higher Ke.

Reading the example

The comparison shows a trade-off:

  • Rev 4 (0.70 mm air gap) has the best harmonics: lowest torque ripple (0.74 %), lowest position error (1.01 %) and lowest THD (0.90 %). But it loses torque (0.09 Nm) and back-EMF.
  • Rev 1 (0.30 mm) and Rev 5 (0.35 mm) keep the full 0.10 Nm, with higher but still low harmonic content.

Which is best depends on your priority. If waveform quality matters most, take Rev 4 and recover the torque elsewhere, for example with more turns or a slightly larger diameter. If torque density matters most, take Rev 5. This matches the Harmonics tip: a wider air gap lowers h5 and the ripple as well, at the cost of torque.

Tips

  • Change one thing per revision where you can. The comparison is much easier to read when only one parameter row differs.
  • Make your final choice here, then confirm that revision at medium or high accuracy and generate its efficiency map (guides 7 and 9).